It’s no secret that the iPod is the king of the digital
media player market, but there is now a surge of players coming out using the
rapidly increasing capacity of flash memory. Personally, I think the iPod
shuffle, and other flash players like the Nomad MuVo that double as a USB jump
drives are not only nice in terms of portability, but easy to use as an MP3
player or storage unit.
Recently, while discussing this with friends, one ridiculed
the Shuffle saying that no one could sell a player that lacked a display. I
happen to disagree with his assertion. Having experimented with a number of
players of this design, both with and without displays, I have to say that the
displays are fairly useless in terms of navigating the content of the device.
About the only thing the display is good for is identifying the currently
playing song. That being the case, why spend extra money for a device with a
display. I will, however, concede that players with displays can be purchased
at a lower price than the Shuffle.
I would not agree that Apple messed up with the shuffle by
leaving out the screen. Admittedly, despite owning a 40GB iPod, I find myself
wanting a Shuffle (in addition to my regular iPod), purely for situations that
demand ultimate portability – working out, etc. The random track selection
feature of the shuffle is also something that will force me to listen to music
in my library that would otherwise go untouched. Even with 8,500+ songs, you’d
be surprised how repetitive things can get when you’re not really dedicated to
building play lists.
Comments